Same team, same market — what would 20% more productive selling time be worth?
Enter how your sales team actually spends its month — days, hours, visits, conversion, order value — and see modelled revenue per rep against actuals. The gap tells you whether the constraint is time, conversion, or territory.
| +10% productivity | ₹7.26 L / rep | ₹72.6 L team |
| +20% productivity | ₹7.92 L / rep | ₹79.2 L team |
| +30% productivity | ₹8.58 L / rep | ₹85.8 L team |
Selling hours = days × hours × (1 − travel/admin share). Orders = visits × conversion. Modelled revenue uses your averages — it is a capacity model, not a forecast.
Compare modelled potential with actual revenue per rep. A big gap with healthy activity points to conversion; weak activity points to coverage or beat discipline; both healthy but low results points to territory potential.
Scenario rows show what +10/20/30% productivity is worth — the cheapest growth most companies own.
Illustrative figures, not a client outcome.
They may be right — territory potential differs. That is exactly why the tool separates activity, conversion and potential: coach the metric the rep controls, fix the ones management controls.
It varies enormously by industry and motion. Your own distribution across reps is the honest benchmark — the spread between best and median is the coaching opportunity.
Version 1.0 · Reviewed 2026-10 · Methodology is fixed and version-controlled; results depend on your inputs.
Productivity gaps are visible now. Want a 90-day plan to close them?
BLEZZINGS runs this analysis inside a focused engagement — with your data, your market and a plan to act on it.