Five growth ideas, one budget. Rank the bets before the offsite does it by volume.
Five initiatives, one budget, one team. Score every bet against weighted criteria, watch the ranking respond as the weights change, and leave with a now/next/later/no-go portfolio instead of a compromise.
Score each bet 1–5 per criterion. Weights are yours to set — watch the ranking change as they do.
Each bet is scored 1–5 on six criteria; weights (0–10) are yours. Scores normalize to /100. Buckets: ≥70 now, 50–69 next, 35–49 later, below 35 no-go.
Sensitivity is the feature: change the weights in front of the leadership team and watch which bets survive. Bets that only win under one weighting scheme are political, not strategic.
Investment and risk are scored as '5 = cheap / safe' so higher is always better — no mixed-direction confusion.
Illustrative figures, not a client outcome.
Because high-impact, low-confidence bets bankrupt companies. Confidence and risk exist precisely to discipline exciting ideas.
Your scores are inflated. Force-rank impact first, or drop the weakest bet entirely — a strategy where everything is now is not a strategy.
Version 1.0 · Reviewed 2026-10 · Methodology is fixed and version-controlled; results depend on your inputs.
Ranked the bets? Now sequence them into the year.
BLEZZINGS runs this analysis inside a focused engagement — with your data, your market and a plan to act on it.