Free Tool · Pricing, Profitability & Portfolio

Customer & Account Profitability Analyzer

Your biggest customer may not be your best customer. Rank accounts by contribution.

Your biggest customer may not be your best customer. Enter revenue and attributable costs per account — discounts, freight, service, credit — and see the real ranking with the action each quadrant demands.

For: CFO / Sales Head·Free — no sign-up for results·Related service: Commercial Excellence

One row per account. Use anonymised labels — this never leaves your browser.

AccountRevenue ₹Product costDiscountsFreightService costCredit cost
Account ranking by contribution
1. Customer B (₹5 L)₹1.95 L · 39%
2. Customer A (₹10 L)₹1.3 L · 13%
3. Customer C (₹8 L)-₹40,000 · -5%
Portfolio average margin12.39%
Action guide
grow

High revenue, healthy margin — protect and expand

reprice

High revenue, thin margin — reprice or renegotiate cost-to-serve

service-efficiently

Small but profitable — serve efficiently

review

Small and thin — review the service model

Never auto-terminate an account from allocation alone — cost allocations are estimates. A "review" flag means investigate, not exit.
Your numbers stay in your browser until you choose to download or share.

How it works

Contribution per account = revenue minus product cost and every attributable commercial cost. Accounts sort by contribution, not turnover.

The quadrant maps revenue against margin: grow (big and healthy), reprice (big but thin), service-efficiently (small but profitable), review (small and thin).

Cost allocations are estimates and the tool says so — a 'review' flag means investigate the service model, never auto-terminate a relationship.

Worked example

Customer A (₹10 L revenue) nets ₹1.5 L after heavy discounts and service; Customer B (₹5 L) nets ₹2 L. The ranking flips the account team's attention — and the renegotiation list.

Illustrative figures, not a client outcome.

Questions, answered

How precise do cost allocations need to be?

Directionally right beats precisely wrong. Freight and discounts are exact; service time is estimated — state your method and apply it consistently.

What about strategic accounts that lose money?

Label them strategic and quantify the subsidy explicitly. A deliberate investment with a review date is fine; an invisible loss is not.

Version 1.0 · Reviewed 2026-10 · Methodology is fixed and version-controlled; results depend on your inputs.

Accounts ranked. Want the repricing and service-model playbook?

BLEZZINGS runs this analysis inside a focused engagement — with your data, your market and a plan to act on it.