Free Tool · Pricing, Profitability & Portfolio

Profit Leakage & Margin Pressure Analyzer

Sales grew 40%. Profit fell. Trace exactly where the margin went.

Revenue went up and profit went down is the most common sentence in Indian consumer businesses. Enter two periods side by side; the bridge shows exactly which line — COGS, freight, returns, channel fees, or discounts — ate the margin, and by how much.

For: CFO / CEO·Free — no sign-up for results·Related service: Pricing & Revenue Management
COGS (% of revenue)
Freight & logistics (% of revenue)
Returns & claims (% of revenue)
Channel / marketplace fees (% of revenue)
Discounts, schemes & rebates (% of revenue)
Enter each cost once. If an expense already sits inside your COGS, leave its line at zero — double counting is how margin bridges lie.
Contribution bridge
Contribution last year (Last year)₹28 L (28.0%)
Contribution this year (This year)₹24.6 L (20.5%)
Change-₹3.4 L

Biggest leaks

Leak 1COGS−₹14.8 L
Leak 2Discounts, schemes & rebates−₹3.2 L
Leak 3Channel / marketplace fees−₹2.8 L

The waterfall

Revenue (Last year → This year)
₹1 Cr → ₹1.2 Cr
COGS
₹14.8 L
Freight & logistics
₹1.2 L
Returns & claims
₹1.4 L
Channel / marketplace fees
₹2.8 L
Discounts, schemes & rebates
₹3.2 L
Contribution change
-₹3.4 L

Case file: “Sales Grew 40%, Profit Fell”

Illustrative composite case — not a client engagement

A consumer brand's sales head reported a record year. The CFO reported a worse one. Here is the P&L. Before the reveal: what do you think ate the profit?

LineYear 1Year 2
Revenue₹10.0 Cr₹14.0 Cr
Growth—+40%
COGS61%62%
Marketplace & channel fees3%9%
Discounts & schemes4%8%
Returns1%4%
Contribution₹3.1 Cr (31%)₹2.38 Cr (17%)
Your call
Your numbers stay in your browser until you choose to download or share.

How it works

The bridge compares contribution (revenue minus all variable commercial costs) across two periods, isolating the year-over-year change in each line.

Costs are entered as % of revenue so mix effects are visible. Enter each cost once — if an expense already sits inside COGS, leave its line at zero. Double counting is how margin bridges lie.

The tool separates gross contribution from operating profit deliberately: overheads only appear if you have the data. Growth that dilutes contribution percentage is flagged even when absolute contribution rises.

Worked example

Revenue grows ₹10 Cr → ₹12 Cr while marketplace fees move 2% → 4% of revenue and schemes 4% → 6%. The bridge shows contribution fell from ₹3.0 Cr to ₹2.76 Cr despite the growth — ₹4.8 L of fees and ₹4.0 L of extra schemes are the two named leaks, not 'the market'.

Illustrative figures, not a client outcome.

Questions, answered

What is the difference between gross margin and contribution?

Gross margin subtracts product cost. Contribution subtracts everything variable that the sale attracts — fees, freight, returns, schemes. Decisions made on gross margin routinely misprice channels.

My revenue grew and contribution fell. Is growth bad?

Not necessarily — but the growth bought with dilutive channels or schemes must be a deliberate, measured investment, not an accident. The bridge tells you which it was.

How far back should I compare?

Year-over-year for seasonality businesses, quarter-over-quarter otherwise. Match periods carefully — comparing Diwali month to a lean month manufactures a fake leak.

Version 1.0 · Reviewed 2026-10 · Methodology is fixed and version-controlled; results depend on your inputs.

Found the leak. Want a team that closes it?

BLEZZINGS runs this analysis inside a focused engagement — with your data, your market and a plan to act on it.