When buyers ask AI for a consultant, does it mention you? Check honestly.
When buyers ask AI for a consultant, does it mention you? Run eight buyer-real prompts across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, record exactly what happens with dates and wording, and get an honest visibility verdict — no simulated answers, no invented scores.
When buyers ask AI for a consultant, does it mention you? This is a manual, evidence-bound audit — we do not simulate AI answers. Run each prompt in each engine, in a logged-out/incognito session, and record what actually happens.
Run each prompt logged-out, record: recommended unprompted / mentioned / absent / rivals recommended. Notes capture engine, date, exact wording.
AI answers vary by day and phrasing — that's why provenance (engine + date + text) is mandatory. An undated claim is an anecdote.
The verdict bands: Visible (3+ unprompted recommendations), Present, or Invisible — with the four honest levers that move it.
Illustrative figures, not a client outcome.
Because API answers aren't what buyers see in consumer apps, and auto-checking tempts daily panic. A monthly manual audit with provenance is decision-grade; automation here produces false precision.
Not directly in the main consumer engines. What works: being cited by the sources they read — specific service pages, reviews, directories and third-party articles.
Version 1.0 · Reviewed 2026-10 · Methodology is fixed and version-controlled; results depend on your inputs.
Invisible where buyers increasingly ask? Build the citation base.
BLEZZINGS runs this analysis inside a focused engagement — with your data, your market and a plan to act on it.